On 11/25/2015 09:16 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:36:18PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> --- a/include/trace/events/gfpflags.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/gfpflags.h
>> @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
>>   *
>>   * Thus most bits set go first.
>>   */
>> -#define show_gfp_flags(flags)                                               
>> \
>> -    (flags) ? __print_flags(flags, "|",                             \
>> +
>> +#define __def_gfpflag_names                                         \
>>      {(unsigned long)GFP_TRANSHUGE,          "GFP_TRANSHUGE"},       \
>>      {(unsigned long)GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,   "GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE"}, \
>>      {(unsigned long)GFP_HIGHUSER,           "GFP_HIGHUSER"},        \
>> @@ -19,9 +19,13 @@
>>      {(unsigned long)GFP_NOFS,               "GFP_NOFS"},            \
>>      {(unsigned long)GFP_ATOMIC,             "GFP_ATOMIC"},          \
>>      {(unsigned long)GFP_NOIO,               "GFP_NOIO"},            \
>> +    {(unsigned long)GFP_NOWAIT,             "GFP_NOWAIT"},          \
>> +    {(unsigned long)__GFP_DMA,              "GFP_DMA"},             \
>> +    {(unsigned long)__GFP_DMA32,            "GFP_DMA32"},           \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_HIGH,             "GFP_HIGH"},            \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_ATOMIC,           "GFP_ATOMIC"},          \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_IO,               "GFP_IO"},              \
>> +    {(unsigned long)__GFP_FS,               "GFP_FS"},              \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_COLD,             "GFP_COLD"},            \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_NOWARN,           "GFP_NOWARN"},          \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_REPEAT,           "GFP_REPEAT"},          \
>> @@ -36,8 +40,12 @@
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_RECLAIMABLE,      "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"},     \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE,          "GFP_MOVABLE"},         \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_NOTRACK,          "GFP_NOTRACK"},         \
>> +    {(unsigned long)__GFP_WRITE,            "GFP_WRITE"},           \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM,   "GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM"},  \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM,   "GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM"},  \
>>      {(unsigned long)__GFP_OTHER_NODE,       "GFP_OTHER_NODE"}       \
>> -    ) : "GFP_NOWAIT"
>>  
>> +#define show_gfp_flags(flags)                                               
>> \
>> +    (flags) ? __print_flags(flags, "|",                             \
>> +    __def_gfpflag_names                                             \
>> +    ) : "none"
> 
> How about moving this to gfp.h or something?
> Now, we use it in out of tracepoints so there is no need to keep it
> in include/trace/events/xxx.

Hm I didn't want to pollute such widely included header with such defines. And
show_gfp_flags shouldn't be there definitely as it depends on __print_flags.
What do others think?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to