On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:09:34 -0500 Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 20:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > mprotect-patch-for-use-by-slim.patch > > integrity-service-api-and-dummy-provider.patch > > integrity-service-api-and-dummy-provider-cleanup-use-of-configh.patch > > integrity-service-api-and-dummy-provider-compilation-warning-fix.patch > > slim-main-patch.patch > > slim-main-patch-socket_post_create-hook-return-code.patch > > slim-main-patch-misc-cleanups-requested-at-inclusion-time.patch > > slim-main-patch-handle-failure-to-register.patch > > slim-main-patch-fix-bug-with-mm_users-usage.patch > > slim-main-patch-security-slim-slm_mainc-make-2-functions-static.patch > > slim-secfs-patch.patch > > slim-secfs-patch-slim-correct-use-of-snprintf.patch > > slim-secfs-patch-cleanup-use-of-configh.patch > > slim-make-and-config-stuff.patch > > slim-make-and-config-stuff-makefile-fix.patch > > slim-debug-output.patch > > slim-fix-security-issue-with-the-task_post_setuid-hook.patch > > slim-secfs-inode-i_private-build-fix.patch > > slim-documentation.patch > > fdtable-make-fdarray-and-fdsets-equal-in-size-slim.patch > > > > Shall hold in -mm. > > Why? They're on hold awaiting further development and awaiting a merge/no-merge decision. They're not causing me any trouble. > I haven't seen any evidence that prior review comments have been > addressed so far, and a fresh patch set would be beneficial anyway to > facilitate full review of the updated code and to allow them to fix > their patch descriptions as well (as they were wrong in some instances, > describing older versions of the code). If/when the developers start doing more work, we can then decide whether to use incremental patches or to take a drop-them-and-start-again approach. (If a whole new patch series comes out, I have tricks which allow me to check that none of the above fixup patches got lost. Those tricks don't work if I drop all the patches first) But yes, it has been pretty quiet. If there's no intention to proceed with these patches, someone please tell me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/