> Applied, thanks. Did you test it (note the "UNTESTED" in the subject!). My usual system for this is getting upgrades and being flaky at the moment.
> Btw, looking at that mce.usable_addr, it doesn't make a whole lotta > sense to me and we can use mce_usable_address() directly instead and use > the byte in struct mce for something more important. So how about I kill > it (diff ontop of yours): Sure. "struct mce" is visible to user space via /dev/mcelog. But the only user is the mcelog(8) daemon ... and it was never updated to look at the usable_addr field. So returning it to "pad" status is fine. -Tony
