On 18-11-15, 10:55, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 2e31d09..686f024 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1233,6 +1233,8 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> struct cpudata *cpu;
> int i;
> #endif
> + int max_policy_calc;
> +
> pr_debug("intel_pstate: %s max %u policy->max %u\n", __func__,
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq, policy->max);
> if (!policy->cpuinfo.max_freq)
> @@ -1249,7 +1251,10 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> limits = &powersave_limits;
> limits->min_policy_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> limits->min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->min_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
> - limits->max_policy_pct = (policy->max * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +
> + max_policy_calc = (policy->max * 1000) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> + limits->max_policy_pct = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_policy_calc, 10);
> +
Nice catch, but why can't we do this instead:
limits->max_policy_pct = DIV_ROUND_UP(policy->max * 100,
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> limits->max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->max_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
>
> /* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */
> @@ -1269,6 +1274,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> int_tofp(100));
> limits->max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits->max_perf_pct),
> int_tofp(100));
> + limits->max_perf = round_up(limits->max_perf, 8);
Perhaps you should fix this in a separate patch.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
