On 11/16/2015 12:56 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
update.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
---
Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:

--->8---
virtual patch

@@
struct pwm_device *p;
expression e;
@@
(
-(p)->polarity = e;
+pwm_set_polarity((p), e);
|
-(p)->polarity
+pwm_get_polarity((p))

s/((p))/(p)/

|
-(p)->period = e;
+pwm_set_period((p), e);
|
-(p)->period
+pwm_get_period((p))

s/((p))/(p)/

|
-(p)->duty_cycle = e;
+pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e);

The (p) seems unnecessary here.

|
-(p)->duty_cycle
+pwm_get_duty_cycle((p))

s/((p))/(p)/

)
--->8---
---
  drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 13 +++++++------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
index 3e23003..105b964 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ static int  __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long 
pwm)
        if (ctx->pwm_value == pwm)
                goto exit_set_pwm_err;

-       duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
-       ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
+       duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)) - 1), MAX_PWM);
+       ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)));

Please drop all the unnecessary ( ).

Thanks,
Guenter

        if (ret)
                goto exit_set_pwm_err;

@@ -234,10 +234,10 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx);

        /* Set duty cycle to maximum allowed */
-       duty_cycle = ctx->pwm->period - 1;
+       duty_cycle = pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)) - 1;
        ctx->pwm_value = MAX_PWM;

-       ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, ctx->pwm->period);
+       ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty_cycle, pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)));
        if (ret) {
                dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to configure PWM\n");
                return ret;
@@ -309,8 +309,9 @@ static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
        if (ctx->pwm_value == 0)
                return 0;

-       duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (ctx->pwm->period - 1), MAX_PWM);
-       ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, ctx->pwm->period);
+       duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)) - 1),
+                           MAX_PWM);
+       ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pwm_get_period((ctx->pwm)));
        if (ret)
                return ret;
        return pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to