On 12 November 2015 at 19:43, Eduardo Valentin <edubez...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:04:09AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > >> > OK >> > >> > If we did that, all devices that had just been unbound from their drivers >> > and had runtime PM disabled after that would be set to "suspended" by the >> > core, right? >> >> Yes, that's the idea. I will send a patch we can test. >> >> > >> > If that helps, I don't really have objections. > > Given this discussion, > > Is this series of two patches on this thermal driver still applicable?
I think patch1 is different, it's a cleanup patch (I just replied to it separately). As for subject patch, I think we agreed upon that it's a workaround but I don't have strong opinion if you want to pick it up anyway. On the other hand the change won't be needed *if* we solve problem via driver core. I intend to send a patch for this on Monday, keep you on cc. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
