On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>  u64 native_sched_clock(void)
>  {
> -     if (static_branch_likely(&__use_tsc)) {
> -             u64 tsc_now = rdtsc();
> -
> -             /* return the value in ns */
> -             return cycles_2_ns(tsc_now);
> -     }
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_TSC
> +     /* return the value in ns */
> +     return cycles_2_ns(rdtsc());
> +#else
>       /*
> -      * Fall back to jiffies if there's no TSC available:
> -      * ( But note that we still use it if the TSC is marked
> -      *   unstable. We do this because unlike Time Of Day,
> -      *   the scheduler clock tolerates small errors and it's
> -      *   very important for it to be as fast as the platform
> -      *   can achieve it. )
> +      * Fall back to jiffies if there's no TSC available: ( But note that we
> +      * still use it if the TSC is marked unstable. We do this because unlike
> +      * Time Of Day, the scheduler clock tolerates small errors and it's very
> +      * important for it to be as fast as the platform can achieve it. )

This comment does not make any sense with this modification.

Thanks,

        tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to