On Tuesday 03 November 2015 16:07:34 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 11/3/2015 5:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Ok, got it.
> >
> > Best add an explanation like the above in the interrupt handler,
> > to prevent this from accidentally getting 'cleaned up' to use
> > readl(), or copied into a driver that uses PCI ordering rules
> > where it is actually wrong.
> >
> 
> I'm adding this disclaimer into the ISR routine.
> 
>         /*
>          * Fine tuned for this HW...
>          *
>          * This ISR has been designed for this particular hardware. Relaxed 
> read
>          * and write accessors are used for performance reasons due to 
> interrupt
>          * delivery guarantees. Do not copy this code blindly and expect
>          * that to work.
>          */
> 
> 

Sounds good.

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to