On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 19:31 +0200, Madalin Bucur wrote: > + if (unlikely(fd_status & FM_FD_STAT_RX_ERRORS) != 0) { > + if (net_ratelimit()) > + netif_warn(priv, hw, net_dev, "FD status = 0x%08x\n", > + fd_status & FM_FD_STAT_RX_ERRORS); > + > + percpu_stats->rx_errors++; > + goto _release_frame; > + }
I cannot find any detailed error accounting(maybe I am not looking hard enough) but I would appreciate if both TX and RX errors where better accounted(rx_length_errors, rx_frame_errors, rx_crc_errors, rx_fifo_errors etc.). This has helped me many times in the past diagnosing board HW problems. Jocke-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/