Oops, this patch was meant to be sent in reply to your "mtd: migrate
'of_node' handling to core, not in mtd_part_parser_data" series. Sorry
for the noise.

On Mon,  2 Nov 2015 00:02:34 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> Used semantic patch with 'make coccicheck MODE=patch COCCI=script.cocci':
> 
> ---8<----
> virtual patch
> 
> @@
> struct nand_chip c;
> struct nand_chip *cp;
> @@
> (
> -(cp)->flash_node
> +nand_get_flash_node(cp)
> |
> -(c).flash_node
> +nand_get_flash_node(&c)
> )
> ---8<----
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Hi Brian,
> 
> I think this patch could be part of your series too.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Boris
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c         | 6 +++---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c         | 6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> index a37659d..2a437c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> @@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static int brcmnand_setup_dev(struct brcmnand_host 
> *host)
>  
>       memset(cfg, 0, sizeof(*cfg));
>  
> -     ret = of_property_read_u32(chip->flash_node,
> +     ret = of_property_read_u32(nand_get_flash_node(chip),
>                                  "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
>                                  &oob_sector);
>       if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 939ab3d..4ac4efe 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -3989,11 +3989,11 @@ int nand_scan_ident(struct mtd_info *mtd, int 
> maxchips,
>       struct nand_flash_dev *type;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (chip->flash_node) {
> +     if (nand_get_flash_node(chip)) {
>               /* MTD can automatically handle DT partitions, etc. */
> -             mtd_set_of_node(mtd, chip->flash_node);
> +             mtd_set_of_node(mtd, nand_get_flash_node(chip));
>  
> -             ret = nand_dt_init(mtd, chip, chip->flash_node);
> +             ret = nand_dt_init(mtd, chip, nand_get_flash_node(chip));
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
>       }
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
> index b6df4c6..1c86c6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c
> @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       for_each_available_child_of_node(nfc->dev->of_node, child) {
>               if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "fsl,vf610-nfc-nandcs")) {
>  
> -                     if (chip->flash_node) {
> +                     if (nand_get_flash_node(chip)) {
>                               dev_err(nfc->dev,
>                                       "Only one NAND chip supported!\n");
>                               err = -EINVAL;
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     if (!chip->flash_node) {
> +     if (!nand_get_flash_node(chip)) {
>               dev_err(nfc->dev, "NAND chip sub-node missing!\n");
>               err = -ENODEV;
>               goto err_clk;
> @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       return mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
>  
>  error:
> -     of_node_put(chip->flash_node);
> +     of_node_put(nand_get_flash_node(chip));
>  err_clk:
>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->clk);
>       return err;



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to