Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> writes: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:17 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> > >> > > Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> writes: >> > > >> > > > OK... I was intrigued, so I adapted my ARM code to the generic case, >> > > > including the overflow avoidance optimizations. Please have look and >> > > > tell me how this works for you. >> > > > >> > > > If this patch is accepted upstream, then it could be possible to >> > > > abstract only the actual multiplication part with some architecture >> > > > specific assembly. >> > > >> > > Good idea. >> > >> > Could you please provide a reviewed-by or acked-by tag? >> >> Sure! >> >> Acked-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrod...@synopsys.com> >> >> BTW I thought about that optimization a bit more and now I think >> we may even skip addition of arch-specific assembly insertions. > > I'm going to do it anyway given that I already have it for ARM. It'll > be opt-in, so if your arch doesn't provide it then the current C > implementation will be used by default.
Great. I'll try it out on MIPS once you've posted the patch. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
