Thanks.

On 2015/10/28 19:42, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2015, 17:51 +0800 schrieb Chen Feng:
>> reset: add driver for hi6220 reset controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Feng <puck.c...@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
>> index 3f03380..3f055e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
>> @@ -167,5 +167,12 @@
>>                      clocks = <&ao_ctrl 36>, <&ao_ctrl 36>;
>>                      clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
>>              };
>> +
>> +            reset_ctrl: reset_ctrl@f7030000 {
>> +                    compatible = "hisilicon,hi6220-reset-ctl";
>> +                    reg = <0x0 0xf7030000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> +                    #reset-cells = <1>;
>> +            };
>> +
> 
> While applying I just noticed that the device tree already contains a
> node claiming the same address space:
> 
>       sys_ctrl: sys_ctrl@f7030000 {
>               compatible = "hisilicon,hi6220-sysctrl", "syscon";
>               reg = <0x0 0xf7030000 0x0 0x2000>;
>               #clock-cells = <1>;
>       };
> 
> It is documented in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/hisilicon/hisilicon.txt and
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/hi6220-clock.txt.
> 
> Could you clarify whether the reset controls are just part of the
> sys_ctrl block? If so, I think you should add #reset-cells = <1> to the
> sys_ctrl node instead.
> 

Yes, It's a part of the sys_ctrl block, I will do as your advice.
> regards
> Philipp
> 
> 
> .
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to