On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:20:53 -0600
Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> This patch adds the product id to the driver model platform device
> name, in addition to the device id.  The IPMI spec does not require
> that individual BMCs in a system have unique devices IDs, but it
> does require that the product id/device id combination be unique.
> 
> This also removes a redundant check and cleans up error handling
> when the sysfs registration fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Carol Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.19/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19.orig/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> +++ linux-2.6.19/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> @@ -1817,13 +1817,12 @@ static int __find_bmc_prod_dev_id(struct
>       struct bmc_device *bmc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
>       return (bmc->id.product_id == id->product_id
> -             && bmc->id.product_id == id->product_id
>               && bmc->id.device_id == id->device_id);
>  }
>  
>  static struct bmc_device *ipmi_find_bmc_prod_dev_id(
>       struct device_driver *drv,
> -     unsigned char product_id, unsigned char device_id)
> +     unsigned int product_id, unsigned char device_id)
>  {
>       struct prod_dev_id id = {
>               .product_id = product_id,
> @@ -1940,6 +1939,9 @@ static ssize_t guid_show(struct device *
>  
>  static void remove_files(struct bmc_device *bmc)
>  {
> +     if (!bmc->dev)
> +             return;
> +
>       device_remove_file(&bmc->dev->dev,
>                          &bmc->device_id_attr);
>       device_remove_file(&bmc->dev->dev,
> @@ -1973,7 +1975,8 @@ cleanup_bmc_device(struct kref *ref)
>       bmc = container_of(ref, struct bmc_device, refcount);
>  
>       remove_files(bmc);
> -     platform_device_unregister(bmc->dev);
> +     if (bmc->dev)
> +             platform_device_unregister(bmc->dev);

platform_device_unregister(NULL) appears to be legal.

>       kfree(bmc);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1990,6 +1993,7 @@ static void ipmi_bmc_unregister(ipmi_smi
>  
>       mutex_lock(&ipmidriver_mutex);
>       kref_put(&bmc->refcount, cleanup_bmc_device);
> +     intf->bmc = NULL;
>       mutex_unlock(&ipmidriver_mutex);
>  }
>  
> ...
>
>       } else {
> -             bmc->dev = platform_device_alloc("ipmi_bmc",
> -                                              bmc->id.device_id);
> +             char name[14];
> +             unsigned char orig_dev_id = bmc->id.device_id;
> +             int warn_printed = 0;
> +
> +             snprintf(name, sizeof(name),
> +                      "ipmi_bmc.%4.4x", bmc->id.product_id);
> +
> +             while (ipmi_find_bmc_prod_dev_id(&ipmidriver,
> +                                              bmc->id.product_id,
> +                                              bmc->id.device_id))
> +             {

The brace should be on the previous line.

> +                     if (!warn_printed) {
> +                             printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
> +                                    "This machine has two different BMCs"
> +                                    " with the same product id and device"
> +                                    " id.  This is an error in the"
> +                                    " firmware, but incrementing the"
> +                                    " device id to work around the problem."
> +                                    " Prod ID = 0x%x, Dev ID = 0x%x\n",
> +                                    bmc->id.product_id, bmc->id.device_id);
> +                             warn_printed = 1;

Perhaps warn_printed should be static


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to