Hi Thomas,
>
> @@ -550,16 +572,27 @@ static void armada_370_xp_mpic_resume(void)
> if (virq == 0)
> continue;
>
> - if (irq != ARMADA_370_XP_TIMER0_PER_CPU_IRQ)
> + data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
> +
> + if (irq != ARMADA_370_XP_TIMER0_PER_CPU_IRQ) {
> + /* Non per-CPU interrupts */
> writel(irq, per_cpu_int_base +
For "Non per-CPU interrupts" per_cpu_int_base is used - is it
intentional? In armada_370_xp_irq_mask/unmask the condition looks
exactly opposite...
> ARMADA_370_XP_INT_CLEAR_MASK_OFFS);
> - else
> + if (!irqd_irq_disabled(data))
> + armada_370_xp_irq_unmask(data);
> + } else {
> + /* Per-CPU interrupts */
> writel(irq, main_int_base +
> ARMADA_370_XP_INT_SET_ENABLE_OFFS);
>
Best regards,
Marcin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
