[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > But that module then depends on both of the others unless you keep > > recompiling it > Not really, see for example ns558.c and adi.c plus their third module > gameport.c, all in drivers/char/joystick. But in the case where there _aren't_ any functions which could usefully be shared between the modules, you've got a whole extra gratuitous module (What's that, 32KiB on some ARM boxen?) just to hold the registration functions, which aren't needed if you just use get_module_symbol(). Provide generic code for registering such stuff and it might be acceptable. Otherwise, get_module_symbol is better. There's no fundamental flaw with get_module_symbol() - just one or two of the current usages of it. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions John Levon
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions John Levon
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modvers... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with mod... John Levon
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work wit... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work wit... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport ... Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work wit... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work... Keith Owens