On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:19:04PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 12:15 +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > >From 539e5d6b7ae8612c0393fe940d2da5b591318d3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:07:05 -0500 > > Subject: [PATCH] [GFS2] Change argument of gfs2_dinode_out > > > > Everywhere this was called, a struct gfs2_inode was available, > > but despite that, it was always called with a struct gfs2_dinode > > as an argument. By making this change it paves the way to start > > eliminating fields duplicated between the kernel's struct inode > > and the struct gfs2_dinode. > More pointless code churn. > > This only makes sense once the file system is working > and we have time to do this type of cleanup on against > a stable and TESTED code base.
Bzzert. Cleaner code is easier to _get_ stable. "Keep it ucking fugly until everyone stops looking at it out of sheer disgust" is a bad idea. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
