> -----Original Message----- > From: Rasmus Villemoes [mailto:li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk] > Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 1:58 PM > Subject: [PATCH] intel: i40e: fix confused code > > This code is pretty confused. The variable name 'bytes_not_copied' > clearly indicates that the programmer knew the semantics of > copy_{to,from}_user, but then the return value is checked for being > negative and used as a -Exxx return value. > > I'm not sure this is the proper fix, but at least we get rid of the > dead code which pretended to check for access faults. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> > ---
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nel...@intel.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
