On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:53:08AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Look like a structure mis-match to me, although lv_v2_t is the same for
> all tools.
Sorry I was wrong. The __unused field is missing.
Yet another reason for an official 0.8 maintaince release ;)
Christoph
--
Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Rik van Riel
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Rik van Riel
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Heinz J. Mauelshagen
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken... Rik van Riel
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Heinz J. Mauelshagen
- Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Christoph Hellwig
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Christoph Hellwig
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andreas Dilger

