That makes sense. Steve Craig Schlenter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:40:33AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: > [/proc/meminfo shared is 0] > > Then shouldn't it be removed? > > Probably not. There may be tools that rely on it existing that may break > if it goes away altogether. > > Maybe 'free' does for example. > > --C - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4test9-pre5 shared memory? Stephen Clark
- Re: 2.4test9-pre5 shared memory? Steven Cole
- Re: 2.4test9-pre5 shared memory? Craig Schlenter
- Re: 2.4test9-pre5 shared memory? Stephen Clark
- Re: 2.4test9-pre5 shared memory? Craig Schlenter
- Stephen Clark