> Shouldn't there also be a way to add non-filedescriptor based events > into this, such as "child exited" or "signal caught" or shm things? Waiting on pthreads condition variables, POSIX message queues, and semaphores (as well as fd's) at the same time would *rock*... Unifying all these "waitable objects" would be tremendously helpful to fully exploit the "library transparency" advantage that Linus brought up. Some libraries might want to wait on things that are not file descriptors... Regards, Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Evan Jeffrey
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementatio... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Gideon Glass
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Simon Kirby
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Simon Kirby
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Dan Maas
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Kai Henningsen
- async IO events Ingo Molnar
- Re: Linux's implementatio... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() n... Felix von Leitner
- RE: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? David Schwartz
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scala... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not s... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() n... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll... Linus Torvalds