On 23 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Either > > (a) Solaris has solved the faster-than-light problem, and Sun engineers > should get a Nobel price in physics or something. > > (b) Solaris "scales" by being optimized for 10000 entries, and not > speeding up sufficiently for a small number of entries. > > You make the call. You will probably get the 6.5 factor because you have some (big) contant setup time. For example t = 1700 + n This gives you an increase of 6.5 from 100 to 10000, although it is of course is O(n). No magic there... :-) /Tobias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalabl... Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not sca... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalabl... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not sca... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll(... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of p... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Linus Torvalds