On 23 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Either
>
> (a) Solaris has solved the faster-than-light problem, and Sun engineers
> should get a Nobel price in physics or something.
>
> (b) Solaris "scales" by being optimized for 10000 entries, and not
> speeding up sufficiently for a small number of entries.
>
> You make the call.
You will probably get the 6.5 factor because you have some (big) contant
setup time. For example
t = 1700 + n
This gives you an increase of 6.5 from 100 to 10000, although it is of
course is O(n). No magic there... :-)
/Tobias
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalabl... Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not sca... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalabl... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not sca... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll(... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of p... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux's implementation ... Linus Torvalds

