"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:07:57 -0600
> From: Matt Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hence, the JVM fails compatibility on Linux 2.4.
>
> Due ot this and other reasons I'm restoring the 2.2.x behavior by
> default, but adding a sysctl so that systems using dynamic addressing
> may elect to get the different bind() behavior.
Thanks!
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Woodhouse
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Eric Lammerts
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alexander Viro
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alan Cox
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Christoph Rohland
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz

