'Yer funny!

If only trolling paid, eh?

Mordy

On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 08:20:37AM -0700, KMF AV wrote:
> First, the 2.4 kernel is years late and doesn't work
> right, and keeps getting rewritten because it's a
> festering hunk of fetid spaghetti inside.
> 
> Then, Alan Cox suggests tossing the versioning scheme
> to the wind even more that it already has been:
> 
> > Alan Cox did post an interesting suggestion. In his 
> > scheme, there would essentially be two stable kernel
> 
> > release tracks. Once 2.4 comes out, the 2.5 
> > development series would go off as usual. At some 
> > point, however, the developers would stop and decide
> 
> > which of the new features could be backported to the
> > 2.4 kernel in a stable manner. That port would be 
> > done, with the result being 2.6. The 2.5 series
> would 
> > then be renamed 2.7, and the whole thing would 
> > eventually be stabilized as 2.8. 
> 
> And then this delightful news story about Linux Kernel
> Programmers -- who don't need debuggers, because
> they're so rad -- don't actually know how to program:
> 
> > The hunt for undefined code. Here's one kind of 
> > problem that a new compiler can turn up. Most C 
> > programmers learn early on to avoid code like:  
> > a[i] = i++; The results of this kind of code are 
> > undefined; the array assignment could happen either 
> > before or after the value of it is incremented. 
> Bernd 
> > Schmidt looked through the kernel source for this 
> > sort of code, and found quite a bit of it. He has 
> > submitted a patch to fix up the things he 
> > encountered; as he puts it, "in some cases, it
> wasn't 
> > entirely clear what the code intended, so I had to 
> > guess." This patch went into 2.4.0-test10-pre4, so
> we 
> > may well find a spot or two where he guessed wrong. 
> > The effort is a good one, though. This kind of code 
> > is a time bomb waiting to go off; it needs to be 
> > cleaned up sooner rather than later. 
> 
> ... obviously the Linux logo should be the
> international symbol for the fucking retard.
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/kmfav/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to