On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>
> > put_files_struct() is a destructor, so it won't help here. The following
> > patch may be of use [...] It's "create an empty
> > files_struct and replace the task->files with it" - thing we can't do via
> > clone() and may want to (khttpd does).
>
> Sorry, what's wrong with just closing the files? It's much
> easier.
Really? You copy all references to new files_struct upon clone(), then
destroy them on close_files() and you claim that it's easier than
clone() with CLONE_FILES (get an extra reference) followed by allocation
of new files_struct (as you would do in your variant anyway) and dropping
aforementioned reference?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
