On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:47:09PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> tmp = *p++;
> *q = f(tmp, *p++);
> return p;
>
> is equivalent to more idiomatic
>
> *q = f(p[0], p[1]);
> return p+2;
Which gets better assembler out of various versions of gcc?
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Richard Guenther
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Horst von Brand
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Mark Montague
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Bill Wendling
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Horst von Brand
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Bernd Schmidt
- Patch to remove undefined C code Jonathan George
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Ben Pfaff
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Alexander Viro
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Mike Castle
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Alexander Viro
- RE: Patch to remove undefined C code Jonathan George
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Ben Pfaff
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Matti Aarnio
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Ben Pfaff
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C code Peter Samuelson
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C co... Tom Leete
- Re: Patch to remove undefined ... Bill Wendling
- Re: Patch to remove undefined ... Tom Leete
- Re: Patch to remove undefined C co... Richard Henderson

