> I have to be wicked crazy - but: > Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010 > (experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000 > > It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet. > The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option. Let me know how it goes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions J . A . Magallon
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Petri Kaukasoina
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Eric Lowe
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Michael Meding
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Andre Tomt
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions J . A . Magallon
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions J . A . Magallon
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Harald Welte
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Johan Kullstam