> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > > > echo "base=0 size=0x100000000 type=write-back" >/proc/mtrr this line immediately locks up the machine. But I want to understand where did you get base=0 and size=0x100000000 from? Shouldn't it be base=0x100000 and size=0xfccf0000 according to this entry from e820: BIOS-e820: 00000000fccf0000 @ 0000000000100000 (usable) Regards, Tigran - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [more findings!] Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [more findings!] Re: test10-pre1 prob... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8... Mark Hemment
- Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperSe... Tigran Aivazian
- 36 bit MTRRs, Re: test10-pre1 problem... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re: test10-pre1... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re: test10-... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re: te... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- IRQ affinity vs. MTR... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: IRQ affinity vs.... Gábor Lénárt
- Re: IRQ affinity vs.... James Simmons
- Re: IRQ affinity vs.... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: IRQ affinity vs.... David Wragg
- Re: IRQ affinity vs.... Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: IRQ affinity vs.... David Wragg