On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I disagree - if we start adding these kinds of heuristics to it, it > wil just be a way for people to try to confuse the OOM code. Imagine > some bad guy that does 15 fork()'s and then tries to OOM... yep. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Gerrit . Huizenga
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Byron Stanoszek
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler Byron Stanoszek
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler john slee
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Paul Jakma