On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Torben Mathiasen wrote: > > My point exactly. The ordering of driver in drivers/scsi is done now, > but I don't see a clean way of doing I2O without moving upperlayers > into a seperate dir. Why? People would tend to use the i2o ones as modules anyway, so they _have_ to work with them all being after the upper layer stuff anyway. Otherwise they didn't even work before (common case: say 'y' to SCSI, say 'm' to the low-level drivers). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/sc... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outsid... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outsid... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/sc... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/sc... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Torben Mathiasen