Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 01:58:32 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Agreed. Not agreed. In this case older version of GCC will have almost exactly the same provlems as with functions. Care to show an example? I do not believe this is true. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] Fix big endian ext2 bmap in 2.2. Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix big endian ext2 bmap in 2.2. David S. Miller
- [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab... Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in ... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in ... Horst von Brand
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] abuse of macros in swab.h Olivier Galibert