On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote: > How did you get away with adding a new member to task_struct yet > not updating the INIT_TASK() macro appropriately? :-) Does it > really compile? There are a lot of fields in the task_struct which do not have fields declared in the INIT_TASK macro. They seem to be set to zero by default. regards, Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000 http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [patch *] VM deadlock fix Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix Roger Larsson
- Problem remains - page_launder? (Was: Re: [patc... Roger Larsson
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix David S. Miller
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix David S. Miller
- test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock during writ... Rik van Riel
- test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock during ... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock... Rik van Riel
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM dea... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... Rik van Riel
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... André Dahlqvist
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... André Dahlqvist
- test9-pre3+t9p2-vmpatch VM... Yuri Pudgorodsky
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... Mohammad A. Haque