Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11

[Alexander Viro]

On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> If it makes the code far cleaner then I have no objection. If we can do a
> simple (different format even) /proc/locks to replace it that scores double
> points ;)

Additional bonus points for changing the name. /proc/fs/locks might be a
good variant...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/