On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:54:14AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:01:25 +0200 > From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > (This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well). > The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an > accept(2) call, in spite of what socket(7) documents. This is a bug. > accept(2) must copy the file descriptor's flag of the socket. > > The socket(7) manpage is buggy, not the kernel. Fixed on vger now. I planned to send an update to Andries soon anyways. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [2.4][2.2] Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK Matthias Andree
- Re: [2.4][2.2] Bug: accept discards socket options/O_... David S. Miller
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONB... Andi Kleen
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONB... Matthias Andree
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_... David S. Miller
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket option... Matthias Andree
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket o... Michael Poole
- Re: No Bug: accept discards sock... Matthias Andree
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket option... Raul Miller
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket option... Andi Kleen
- Re: No Bug: accept discards socket option... Matthias Andree
- Re: [2.4][2.2] Bug: accept discards socket option... kuznet