On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 05:51:43PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Why would this not have happened for a module? > > I agree that the thing looks fishy. But this is not new code, and it has > worked previously. What changed? Maybe nobody ever insmod'ed a module for a scsi device they don't have? OG. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Mr. James W. Laferriere
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Sven Koch
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Olivier Galibert
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Rogier Wolff
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Rogier Wolff
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Eric Youngdale
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds