On Friday September 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Are you sure there are no deadlock-when-low-on-memory bugs
> > hiding somewhere? swap over nbd also *seems* to work.
Raid preallocates all the memory that it needs.
When raid1 runs out of pre-allocated memory, it will try to see if
kmalloc(GFP_BUFFER) has any to spare and will use it transiently, but
it copes quite well if kmalloc doesn't provide any.
I think this is adequate to fend of deadlock-when-low-on-memory
problems.
But surely, deadlock-when-low-on-memory problems will hurt normal
filesystem activity just as much as swap activity -- is that right?
>
> Good that you mention this. I should look into this some
> day, preferably in the very near future.
>
> (added to my VM TODO list)
Always happy to have others do code reviews!
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
