> The very fact that a large and important patch by > (as far as I can see) the NFS _maintainers_ is not > being accepted by the stable kernel maintainer does > not fill one with hope about the quality of the patch. The current patch actually looks pretty good. Its a timing issue now - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Steven N. Hirsch
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 David S. Miller
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 bert hubert
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Mike Castle
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Ralf Gerbig
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Distro kernel patches ... David S. Miller
- Re: Distro kernel patches ... Hubert Mantel
- Re: Distro kernel patches ... Alan Cox
- Re: Distro kernel patches ... Matthew Kirkwood