On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 03:33:54PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > The tricky part of the crash simulator would be recovering the resources > the filesystem was using and convincing the VFS to let go of the the > partition. If you could return the system to a stable state you could > do many, many more test runs in the same time. Maybe VMWare could help > here. User-Mode-Linux would probably be the better choice. You simply crash the kernel with a few kills. It is also free unlike VMWare. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: VM in v2.4.0test9 Rik van Riel
- Re: VM in v2.4.0test9 Roger Larsson
- Re: VM in v2.4.0test9 David Weinehall
- Re: VM in v2.4.0test9 Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM in v2.4.0test9 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: VM in v2.4.0test9 Rik van Riel
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Robert Redelmeier
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Andi Kleen
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Andreas Dilger
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Robert Redelmeier
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Ralf Baechle
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Rik van Riel
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Rik van Riel
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ? Rik van Riel