> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:27:16 +0100 (BST), > Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >S/390 folks run 70,000 sessions active within the same 60 second period off > >one big box. Not on Linux (yet ;)) but its worth bearing in mind. > > FYI, OS/390 Unix System Services uses a halfword for the maximum number > of processes in system limits MAXPROCSYS and MAXPROCUSER. The fields The 70,000+ users folk dont run OS/390 unix services either - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Andries Brouwer
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Stephen Frost
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security David Weinehall
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Alan Cox
- Alan, are you out there?! David Weinehall
- Re: Alan, are you out there?! David Weinehall
- Re: Alan, are you out there?! David Weinehall
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Keith Owens
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Alan Cox
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Brett Frankenberger
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Michael van den broek
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / securit... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / sec... Michael van den broek
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Mark Hahn
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / securit... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: 32-bit pid_t / security Andries Brouwer