> this would be differemt, but AFAIK the redhat package management system is > not able to provide for this). You have no idea what you're talking about. > > So let's die this thread, or at least the name-calling right now. I'll try > as best as I can to keep the disucssion to the original, on-topic point > only. Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Michael Meding
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Stefan Traby
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Richard Henderson
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Harald Dunkel
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Michael Peddemors
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Alexander Viro