Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 17:49:04 -0600 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This is going to be a continuing problem for non-Unix file systems like NTFS and NWFS that rely on the ability to read and write variable length sector runs. It's not just non-Unix file systems. I believe that xfs will find this useful as well. It's just a timing issue, though, making a change like this is going to have to be a 2.5 thing (along with removing the 2TB limitation, and other cleanups in the buffer cache code that has been long overdue). - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Andries Brouwer
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block s... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Alan Cox
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Andre Hedrick
- RE: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Matt_Domsch
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Andries Brouwer
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block s... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one blo... Alexander Viro
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, no... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Alexander Viro
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Peter Samuelson
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Alexander Viro
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick