Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 17:49:04 -0600
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is going to be a continuing problem for non-Unix file systems like
NTFS and NWFS that rely on the ability to read and write variable length
sector runs.
It's not just non-Unix file systems. I believe that xfs will find this
useful as well. It's just a timing issue, though, making a change like
this is going to have to be a 2.5 thing (along with removing the 2TB
limitation, and other cleanups in the buffer cache code that has been
long overdue).
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Andries Brouwer
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block s... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Alan Cox
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Andre Hedrick
- RE: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Matt_Domsch
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block size Andries Brouwer
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one block s... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one blo... Alexander Viro
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, not one... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size, no... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Alexander Viro
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Peter Samuelson
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Alexander Viro
- Re: reading 1 hardsector size... Andre Hedrick

