> what is wrong with clearing the first performance counter before using it? > The NMI oopser is completely nonintrusive. > > so on UP systems you'll have to choose between the NMI oopser and other > uses of the first counter. You can save/restore the contents of the first > counter if you want to reactivate the NMI oopser. This is all user-space > policy, the kernel doesnt mind. Thanks for the info: I'd entirely forgotten about the inter-APIC comms bus. That given, I have no problem with clearing the perfctr before use. The NMI oopser has saved my bacon on more than one occasion :) -- Keir - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog ... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watch... Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI ... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and ... Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog on UP systems John Levon
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog on UP systems Keir Fraser
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog on UP sy... Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog on UP sy... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog on U... Keir Fraser
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog ... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watch... John Levon
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI ... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watch... David Mentré
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI ... Philip J. Mucci
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] enabling APIC and NMI watchdog on UP systems Mikael Pettersson