> I don't want to take a position on the matter of C vs. C++ in the Linux > kernel. However, I *have* done some realistic work to show that C++ does > not inherently introduce bloat. (I do my embedded work in C++.) > > <http://www.picturel.com/ucr-coots97/ur.html> > > Of course, I write my Linux drivers (and GIMP plug-ins) in C, not C++, and > that's fine, too. I'm just glad it's not Scheme:-) Compilers tend to get better.. Luckely. It was giving overhead in the generated asm a year ago. No idea what it is now. Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Mike Touloumtzis
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Stephen Williams
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Ralf Baechle
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Stephen Frost
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Timur Tabi
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in ... Erik Mouw