On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Miles Lane wrote: > Perhaps the Linux community should draft up some > guidelines for the job of maintainer that would include > some mechanism for replacing a maintainer who is not > effectively shepherding his port. Since when it is decided by community? It's not a democracy. You don't like it - maintain your tree and accept/reject whatever you want. I find plonk-by-domain silly, but the contents of filters is the private business of person using them. Period. We've been through that quite a few times when Alan-uses-*R*S threads appeared on the list. Enough, already. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux.u H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Dan Hollis
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Eli Carter
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Alan Cox
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Philipp Rumpf
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Mike Touloumtzis
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Mark Hahn
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Mark Hahn
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Miles Lane
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Alexander Viro
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. George France
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. George France
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Jes Sorensen
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Jeff Garzik
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. George France
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Mike A. Harris
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. George France
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Howell, David P
- Re: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Russell King
- RE: Russell King forks ARM Linux. Erik Mouw