On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:42:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> of the VM allocation issues. Returning NULL in kmalloc() is just a way to
> say: 'oops, we screwed up somewhere'. And i'd suggest to not work around
That is not at all how it is currently used in the kernel.
> such screwups by checking for NULL and trying to handle it. I suggest to
> rather fix those screwups.
Kmalloc returns null when there is not enough memory to satisfy the request. What's
wrong with that?
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
