> > the reserved flag bits are non-zero. The only things this protects > > anyone from are extensions such as ECN :-) > > To be fair even older netfilter had the same problem (ipt_unclean would > complain about the reserved bits). It is probably a common bug. The current British Standard kitemark for a firewall appears to require the bug 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: www.crucial.com won't talk... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to ... Alan Cox
- Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to ... David Ford
- Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to ... David Ford
- Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0... David S. Miller
- Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to ... Alex Buell
- ECN & cisco firewall Ulrich Kiermayr
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall David S. Miller
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Ulrich Kiermayr
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Andi Kleen
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Alan Cox
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Alan Cox
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Graham Murray
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Graham Murray
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall David S. Miller
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Andi Kleen
- Re: ECN & cisco firewall Lincoln Dale
- Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system Elmer Joandi