On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 06:19:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Another thing I would worry about are ports with multiple user page > > sizes in 2.5. Another ugly case is the x86-64 port which has 4K pages > > but may likely need a 16K kernel stack due to the 64bit stack bloat. > > yep, but these cases are not affected, i think in the order != 0 case we > should return NULL if a certain number of iterations did not yield any > free page. Ok, that would just break fork() -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: the new VMt Oliver Xymoron
- Re: the new VMt Jeff Garzik
- Re: the new VMt [4MB+ blocks] Matti Aarnio
- Re: the new VMt [4MB+ blocks] Stephen Williams
- Re: the new VMt Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VMt Jes Sorensen
- Re: the new VMt Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VMt Jes Sorensen
- Re: the new VMt Andi Kleen
- Re: the new VMt Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VMt Andi Kleen
- Re: the new VMt Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VMt Linus Torvalds
- Re: the new VMt Rik van Riel
- Re: the new VMt Linus Torvalds
- Re: the new VMt Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VMt Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VMt Rik van Riel
- Re: the new VMt Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VMt Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VMt Rusty Russell