On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > exactly, and this is why if a higher level lets through a GFP_KERNEL, then > it *must* succeed. Otherwise either the higher level code is buggy, or the > VM balance is buggy, but we want to have clear signs of it. I'm not sure if we should restrict the limiting only to the cases that needs them. For example do_anonymous_page looks a place that could rely on the GFP retval. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM yodaiken
- Re: the new VM Pavel Machek
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli