On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i had yesterday - those were simple VM deadlocks. I dont see any deadlocks Definitely. They can't explain anything about the VM deadlocks. I was _only_ talking about the blkdev hangs that caused you to unplug the queue at each reschedule in tux and that Eric reported me for the SG driver (and I very much hope that with EXCLUSIVE gone away and the wait_on_* fixed those hangs will go away because I don't see anything else wrong at this moment). > but one of these two fixes could explain the slowdown i saw on and off for > quite some time, seeing very bad read performance occasionally. (do you > remember my sched.c tq_disc hack?) Exactly, that's the only thing I was talking about in this subthread. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar