On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 01:34:33PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > common association. It's a documentation issue as much as anything, Agreed. > and you've basically taken care of that in -pre6. Looks fine to me too. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Jan Niehusmann
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Peter Samuelson
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Linus Torvalds
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Peter Samuelson
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre... Jeff Garzik
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre... Linus Torvalds
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test... Peter Samuelson
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test... Jan Niehusmann
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test... Jeff Garzik
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test... Peter Samuelson
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Jeff Garzik
- Re: lvm in 2.4.0-test9pre5 Peter Samuelson