On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 11:36:17AM +0000, John Alvord wrote: > A 2.5-time problem is that portions of the kernel are planned to > become interruptible... so saving and restoring around a certain usage > would be insufficient. It is sufficient when you do tsk->flags |= PF_USEDFPU first. Anyways, better think about 2.5 when it is there and not now. Overdesigning for possible futures is usually a mistake, because the future often looks different than you think now and you have to remove the garbage then anyways. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kernel Rusty Russell
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kernel Lyle Coder
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kernel Timur Tabi
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kern... Brian Gerst
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kern... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the ... Alan Cox
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the ... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kernel Ricky Beam
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kern... Lyle Coder
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the ... John Alvord
- Re: Question: Using floating point in ... Andi Kleen
- Re: Question: Using floating poin... Alan Cox
- Re: Question: Using floating ... Andi Kleen
- Re: Question: Using floating ... Alan Cox
- Re: Question: Using floating ... Andi Kleen
- Re: Question: Using floating ... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Question: Using floating point in the kern... Alan Cox